Exact(8)
Reconstructed images of the different protocols were assessed and compared by visual analysis by experts and by time-activity-curves generated from regions-of-interest for various organs (normalized uptake values).
Linearity and efficiency of the protocols were assessed using a standard curve constructed by the amplification of plasmid standard pools with a total number of 5·109 copies/ml including different mutant DNA frequencies, ranging from 100% to 0.39%.
Six different PCR protocols were assessed.
Three different fermentation protocols were assessed.
In each center, the presence and number of empiric AT protocols were assessed.
Full reports of included reviews and review protocols were assessed to establish details of the economics component of each review.
Similar(52)
The agreement between CT protocols was assessed with Bland Altman analysis.
RNA degradation after the different staining protocols was assessed in two seminoma samples that were sectioned and stained with haematoxylin, Kiel, NBT BCIP or ORO and two rat testes that were stained with haematoxylin and ORO.
The potential heterogeneity due to different contrast material protocols was assessed through the comparison of all perfusion parameters (Table 1).
The adequacy of reporting of protocols was assessed through data extracted from the http://ClinicalTrials.gov database and their subsequent publications.
Although these principles and requirements are intended to be standards against which protocols are assessed, existing codes and guidelines include few provisions that ensure adequacy of the REC review process or reasonable application of principles.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com