Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(19)
To ensure all lipids investigated were reasonable recovered, recovery of various lipids using in current extraction protocol were compared with a recent reported protocol [41], and comparable recoveries were obtained for all lipids investigated in this study.
The numbers of non-ovulated follicles, ova ovulated, and ova collected for each protocol were compared.
In addition, the optimized protocol were compared with two standardized extraction procedures assessing açaí and grape pulps.
The lipoprotein subtractions obtained by the optimized protocol were compared with the commercially available and commonly used Lipoprint® Lipoprotein Subfractions Testing System from Quantimetrix.
The frequencies of each protocol were compared among the intervals with the proportion test [9].
Separation measurements between groups over the 4 phases of the loading protocol were compared using one-way ANOVA.
Similar(41)
The performance of our protocol is compared to the Directed Diffusion protocol.
The automated protocol was compared to manual preparation using six adjacent sections from a gingival tissue biopsy obtained from a patient with periodontitis.
The purity of the SC populations isolated with our protocol was compared in different muscle biopsies by assessing the transcript levels of the SC marker Pax7.
This predicted protocol was compared to the one used during the formal validation.
Firstly, our protocol was compared to the ground reaction force method (GRF), accounted as a standard in CoM estimation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com