Suggestions(1)
Exact(2)
Note that per protocol results for DAS28 are not shown but are consistent with ITT results.
Adjusting the long protocol results for a comparable number of transferred blastocysts may partially explain the PR difference.
Similar(58)
Given improvements in technology over the course of the project, our sequencing protocol resulted, for a substantial proportion of samples, in considerably deeper coverage than had been our target (summary sequencing statistics for each monkey are given in Additional file 1: Table S1).
The ITT population was comparable with the per-protocol results for all secondary end points of blood glucose control.
The mITT data for all end-points are presented here, as are the per-protocol results for the primary end-point.
The BioAssay database (accession AID) includes depositor-provided experimental result information, including experiment description, experiment protocol, and results for substance SIDs tested in a biological assay.
Tables S6 S8 present the stereological parameters and counting protocol and results for microglia and PNs in CA3.
Figure 1A gives an outline of the screening protocol, and results for a representative plate from this screening are shown in Figure 1B.
Of the 44 respondents who agreed to be re-interviewed, three questionnaires were rejected because they were not completed in line with the study protocol, resulting in 41 questionnaires for the retest analysis.
In the present paper, we report optimized protocols and results for ten monoclonal antibodies for immunoblotting, immunohistochemistry, immunoprecipitation and kinase activity assays, in rat, mouse and human brain tissue.
Two patients presented with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma and were included as non-specified glaucoma; one patient had open-angle glaucoma in both eyes but was assigned to the non-specified glaucoma group because of a coding error Efficacy data were similar in the ITT and per-protocol populations; results for the ITT population are presented.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com