Sentence examples for protocol discrepancies from inspiring English sources

Specifically, as shown above we cannot address some of the data interoperability problems without reasoning about the architecture of the different systems and their protocols since architectural and protocol discrepancies are at the root of the data mismatches.

No significant protocol discrepancies or deviations were noted.

Data were extracted by two researchers in accordance with a pre-specified fixed protocol; discrepancies were resolved by discussion.

Many of the hair samples from the Nigerian locations had been typed previously for some of the loci selected, and were adjusted to the differences in base pair sizes due to apparatus and protocol discrepancies [ 13, 65].

PCR conditions for the georeferenced hair samples were: 95°C for 15 min, 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 60°C for 90 s, 72°C for 1 min, and a final extension of 60°C for 30 min. Although many of the hair samples had been typed previously [ 29], each of the georeferenced samples were retyped for this study to avoid differences in base pair sizes due to apparatus and protocol discrepancies [ 42].

Regarding manual and automatic SeptiFast® protocols, discrepancies basically involved negative results for conventional extraction and positive results for extraction with MagNA pure, except in one case, where Klebsiella pneumoniae was detected with the manual method while sample was negative for automatic extraction and blood culture.

The complete studies were then rescreened and reviewed by two investigators based on prospective protocol, with discrepancies resolved by consulting a third investigator.

To identify the occurrence and determinants of protocol-publication discrepancies in clinical drug trials.

No discrepancy; General remarks: comments on terminology, protocol design, etc.; Discrepancy insignificant from clinical point of view, not affecting the treatment and/or the quality of life; Discrepancy significant from clinical point of view, hypothetically affecting the treatment and/or the quality of life.

Adjudication with a standardized protocol occurred when discrepancies emerged.

For example using a prospective design may ameliorate review bias, and independently reviewing pre-and post test clinical assessment and strictly adhering to a study protocol may ameliorate discrepancies between stated clinical assessment and actual clinical action.