proprietary extensions

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'proprietary extensions' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase to refer to specific features, programs, or code that are available only to a particular company or person, as opposed to being available to the public. For example, "This software company developed several proprietary extensions to its programs to ensure its customers had the best possible user experience."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

16 human-written examples

A popular approach is to sell proprietary extensions to an open-source core.

The Economist

Initially, Bluetooth devices may be sold in tandem say, a headset with a phone which risks Balkanising the standard with proprietary extensions.

The Economist

Contrast this with the old Microsoft-Netscape battle, when both firms added proprietary extensions to existing web standards in an attempt to lock in users.Netscape claims that its software, called Gecko, is the most standards-compliant browser around.

The Economist

They are also trying to lock in customers by adding proprietary extensions to the standards mix.Most worrying, however, is the possibility that software firms will have to pay if they implement web-services standards.

The Economist

Scott Ross, chief technology officer at global marketing and technology agency, DigitasLBi, describes how their recruitment team utilises commercial tools and proprietary extensions to simplify the process of candidate data aggregation, and to provide scoring on basic metrics such as skill proficiency, demand potential, and acquisition cost.

The Guardian - Tech

A variety of smaller companies like Bluenog have models that combine open source, proprietary extensions and professional services.

Forbes

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

44 human-written examples

In fact, Microsoft's alteration or proprietary extension of industry standards more closely resembles conduct for which Microsoft was absolved of liability; the appellate court absolved Microsoft of liability for its development of a Java implementation incompatible with Sun's Java Implementation.

The New York Times

However, SPARQL does not contain support for calling stored procedures, and many RDF storages lack a proprietary extension.

Journal of Cheminformatics

These browser-specific bleeding-edge features have always been there, for example, XMLHttpRequest, the core component to Ajax, started a a proprietary extension to IE 5.0.

TechCrunch

Most people will think this is good news unless of course you are Technorati, Pingomatic etc. Reading through the FAQ it's good to see that Google have stuck to the XML-RPC standard and not "Googled it" i.e the big fear was they might have only embraced the XML-RPC protocol in order to create a proprietary extension like Gdata (Atom Publishing Protocol) or Coop (OpenSearch)?

TechCrunch

The World Wide Web Consortium, the not-for-profit organization that creates the web's open technology standards, made a brave effort to tame the web's lunatic proprietary HTML extensions that paid off, making those "Best viewed with" badges on websites a relic of the past.

The Guardian - Tech

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing open-source software, clearly distinguish between the core open components and any "proprietary extensions" your organization has developed to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid implying that "proprietary extensions" are revolutionary when they are merely incremental improvements. Be realistic about their impact and differentiation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "proprietary extensions" functions as a noun phrase, where "proprietary" modifies "extensions", indicating that these extensions are owned and controlled by a specific entity. Ludwig AI indicates this phrase is grammatically correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Academia

10%

Wiki

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "proprietary extensions" is a common and grammatically correct term used to describe exclusive add-ons or features owned by a specific entity. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it functions as a noun phrase, frequently appearing in news, media, and science contexts. The term typically carries a professional register and is used to differentiate custom enhancements from standard or open-source options. When using this phrase, it's essential to focus on the unique value these extensions provide and avoid overstating their impact.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

exclusive add-ons

Replaces "proprietary" with "exclusive" and "extensions" with "add-ons", emphasizing exclusivity.

private enhancements

Substitutes "proprietary" with "private" and "extensions" with "enhancements", highlighting the private nature of the additions.

branded features

Replaces "proprietary" with "branded" and "extensions" with "features", focusing on the brand identity of the additions.

custom additions

Substitutes "proprietary" with "custom" and "extensions" with "additions", emphasizing the tailored nature of the features.

non-public integrations

Replaces "proprietary" with "non-public" and "extensions" with "integrations", highlighting the restricted accessibility of the integrations.

protected components

Substitutes "proprietary" with "protected" and "extensions" with "components", emphasizing the protected status of the components.

company-specific features

Replaces "proprietary" with "company-specific" and "extensions" with "features", highlighting the company-related nature of the features.

restricted modules

Substitutes "proprietary" with "restricted" and "extensions" with "modules", emphasizing the restricted access to the modules.

secret plugins

Replaces "proprietary" with "secret" and "extensions" with "plugins", highlighting the hidden aspect of the plugins.

internal upgrades

Substitutes "proprietary" with "internal" and "extensions" with "upgrades", emphasizing that it's for internal use.

FAQs

How can I use "proprietary extensions" in a sentence?

You can use "proprietary extensions" to describe features or functionalities that are exclusively owned and controlled by a specific company. For example, "The software offers a range of open-source tools alongside several "proprietary extensions" to enhance functionality".

What's a simpler way to say "proprietary extensions"?

Alternatives include "exclusive add-ons", "private enhancements", or "branded features", depending on the specific context you want to convey.

Are "proprietary extensions" always closed-source?

Yes, "proprietary extensions" are generally closed-source, meaning the source code is not publicly available and is protected by the owner. This is in contrast to open-source extensions, where the source code is accessible and modifiable.

What is the difference between "proprietary extensions" and standard features?

"Proprietary extensions" are additional features or functionalities that are not part of the standard or open-source version of a product. They are specifically developed and owned by a company to provide added value or competitive advantage.