Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

proprietary by

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "proprietary by" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to describe something that is owned or controlled by a specific entity, but the phrasing is awkward and unclear. Example: "The software is proprietary by the company, meaning it cannot be shared or modified without permission."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

8 human-written examples

Mr. Schwartz testified that Java's A.P.I.'s were not considered proprietary by Sun.

Such financing amounts are often considered proprietary by the organizations and their directors, but critics contend that the industry's sway over such groups leads them to lobby on the industry's behalf.

Such funding amounts are often considered proprietary by the organizations and their directors, but critics contend that the industry's sway over such groups leads them to lobby on industry's behalf.

However, quite likely the MCPS will reinvent technology held as proprietary by some organization.

Although such equipment is comparatively simple in concept, it is usually large and expensive, so that efficiencies and other aspects are considered proprietary by the small number of manufacturers in this field.

Some datasets are considered proprietary by those who collected them, and other datasets are not available in digital format.

Science

Plosone
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

The libraries were quantified by ECO (Illumina, San Diego, USA) and sequenced using the Solexa's proprietary sequencing-by-synthesis method.

Whole-genome sequencing was performed (CG) using their proprietary sequencing-by-ligation technology [ 10].

The purified PCR products were subjected to Solexa's proprietary sequencing-by-synthesis method on the Illumina 1G Genome Analyzer.

The PCR products resolved in a 12% TBE urea polyacrylamide gel were eluted with elution buffer, quantified and subjected to Solexa's proprietary sequencing-by-synthesis method.

The cDNA was amplified with 18 PCR cycles to produce sequencing libraries that were subjected to Illumina/Solexa's proprietary sequencing-by-synthesis method.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Prefer clearer and more grammatically sound alternatives like "owned by", "controlled by", or "exclusive to" to enhance clarity and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "proprietary by" when you actually mean "developed by" or "created by". "Proprietary" refers to ownership and exclusive rights, not necessarily the origin or creator.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "proprietary by" aims to indicate ownership or control, but its grammatical structure is not standard. The intended function is to specify who owns or controls a particular item, process, or piece of information. According to Ludwig AI, this is an incorrect grammar.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "proprietary by" intends to convey ownership or control but suffers from grammatical issues. Ludwig AI recognizes this as an incorrect grammar. Although it appears in various sources including news, science, and business contexts, clearer alternatives such as "owned by" or "controlled by" are recommended for better clarity and grammatical correctness. Despite its occurrence, favoring more precise language will improve your writing and avoid potential confusion.

FAQs

What's a clearer alternative to "proprietary by"?

Alternatives such as "owned by", "controlled by", or "exclusive to" offer more precise and grammatically sound ways to express the intended meaning.

When is it appropriate to use the term 'proprietary'?

The term 'proprietary' is appropriate when indicating that something is exclusively owned and legally protected by an individual or organization, often referring to intellectual property or trade secrets.

Is "proprietary by" considered grammatically correct in formal writing?

No, "proprietary by" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. Using phrases like "owned by" or "controlled by" is preferable in formal writing.

How does using "proprietary by" affect the clarity of my writing?

Using "proprietary by" can introduce ambiguity and reduce clarity. Opting for more direct and widely accepted alternatives ensures that your intended meaning is easily understood by your audience.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: