While not all Bayesians accept evidence proportionism, the account of incremental evidence as change in subjective probability really only makes sense if one supposes that a subject's level of confidence in a proposition varies directly with the strenght of her evidence for its truth.
Support for this proposition varied somewhat along party lines, but not by much: 91percentt of Republicans agreed, but so, too, did 73percentt of Democrats.
Kaplan's semantics entails that that propositions can vary in truth-value from one time to another.
He writes to Arnauld: "To be brief, I hold as axiomatic the identical proposition which varies only in emphasis: that what is not truly one being is not truly one being either" (30 April 1687).
Estimating actual rates of duplication, recombination, and deletion during the 100 Myr of evolution encompassing the putative WGD event constitutes a difficult proposition, especially because rates vary with time.
Although group E constructed varied propositions to support their claim of choice and refuted the other, they only managed to get 20% of their propositions to match the teacher's scoring scheme.
One is free to vary the language in which a proposition is expressed but not the proposition itself.
Versions of this view vary both according to which properties they take propositions to be, and what they take propositions to be properties of.
If not all propositions exist necessarily, then questions related to the boolean operations receive answers which may vary according to the existence-conditions which are imposed on propositions.
Further, insofar as "intuitions" are understood to rest solely on the understanding of the relevant epistemic proposition, the depth, or degree, of understanding can vary across individuals and cultures, and this could account for differing intuitions.
