This, together with a fine-grained principle of individuation for propositions (asserting, for one thing, that if the classes m and n of propositions differ, then any proposition about m will differ from any proposition about n) leads to contradiction.
Check out Reboot Illinois to see how else Rauner's and the Senate's propositions differ.
A term is said to be distributed in a given proposition if that proposition implies all other propositions that differ from it only in having, in place of the original term, any other term whose extension is a part of that of the original term i.e., if, and only if, the term as it is used in that occurrence covers all the members of the class that it denotes.
In so doing, we shall see various respects in which accounts of structured propositions can differ.
Various accounts of structured propositions that differ in these ways will be discussed below.
Can two sentences express the same proposition, but differ in truth-value?
In conclusion, given a proposition, languages differ in the time point at which the sentence mood is marked in the surface structure of interrogatives.
Second, McTaggart claims that metaphysical materialists, dualists, Berkeleyian idealists, and Hegelians all accept the same system of scientific propositions, whilst differing amongst themselves on the issue of how these propositions are to be interpreted.
Like the Anscombe-Copi reading, the view just outlined treats the forms of elementary propositions as differing radically from anything we may be familiar with from ordinary — or even Fregean — grammar.
It is thus possible for two individuals in different worlds to assert exactly the same propositions, and yet differ with respect to having asserted a true proposition.
The relativist about epistemic modals takes appearance here to be reality, and holds that, in addition to worlds (and maybe times), propositions can sometimes differ in their truth-value relative to contexts of assessment (roughly, the context in which the proposition is being considered).
