Thus, on this way of interpreting Frege, the mechanism for binding together the constituents of a structured proposition is built right into some of the constituents, (recall that this was true of the view of Zalta [1988] as well).
I know this sounds harsh, and technically I'm a fan of Ethereum — my own pet crypto projects are built on it — but its value proposition is built around dapps, and no dapp hits means no value.
"Our zero FX proposition is built on the foundations of the innovative technology at the heart of Curve, enabling us to perform FX swaps on top of any card that you have loaded into your Curve wallet without the user needing to do anything special and with the transaction showing in the underlying cards native currency," Curve CTO Matt Collinge tells me.
More complex propositions, called molecular propositions, are built up out of atomic propositions via the logical connectives such as "… or …," "… and …," and "… not …"—and the truth-value of the molecular proposition is in each case a function of the truth-values of its component atomic propositions.
On Zalta's view, such singular propositions are built out of abstract individuals that encode the cognitive content of names.
Yet at the bottom level such a view seems to require singular propositions, which are the basic or atomic propositions upon which the complex propositions are built.
Propositions may also be built up, not out of other propositions but out of elements that are not themselves propositions.
Wodeham discusses the question of evidence for a proposition which can be built from these initial apprehensions in the sixth question of the prologue.
As many of us know, FB's entire value proposition was originally built on Zuckerberg and his college friends surfing girls' pictures for lascivious opportunity.
If we adopt a Russellian view of propositions, this is straightforward, because it is built into the Russellian view that propositions are composed of objects, properties, and relations (see section 1).
