Analysis makes the proposition more complicated than it was, but it cannot and must not make it more complicated than its meaning [Bedeutung] was from the first.
In this case, we would say that there is something wrong with my credences, for if it lands on six, it lands on an even number, and I ought not to believe a proposition more strongly than I believe any of its logical consequences.
The three rectangular cells are jointly exhaustive and mutually exclusive: every proposition is either necessary, contingent, or impossible, but no proposition is more than one of these.
Thus, philosophers were open to an account of propositions that individuated propositions more finely than the possible worlds account.
In particular, they attempt to individuate propositions (or things that do the work of propositions) more finely than possible worlds accounts of propositions.
First, as was mentioned above, structured proposition accounts, unlike possible world accounts of propositions, allow for distinct necessarily equivalent propositions, and thus individuate propositions more finely than possible worlds accounts.
(See Gaskin 2008: 106–10, for argument on the point, with references to further literature; cf. Dodd 2008a: 83–6).[26] It might appear that we individuate propositions more finely than facts: for example, one might argue that the fact that Hesperus is bright is the same fact as the fact that Phosphorus is bright, but that the propositions in question are different (Künne 2003 10 122003 10 12
[Cf. TLP 3.261.] The analysed proposition mentions more than the unanalysed.
The company's value proposition is more than just guided gallery tours.
In medieval terminology, "hypothetical" propositions included more than conditionals.
