Sentence examples for proposition for all from inspiring English sources

The homophobia factor was a tricky proposition for all parties.

(And natch, people with time on their hands have tested the proposition for all to see on YouTube; for example, here and here).

Here was another instance of false advertising: NAFTA was never going to be, as some enthusiasts claimed, a win-win proposition for all of North America's citizens, even if all three countries could hope to gain in the aggregate.Yes, it workedSo far as its economic effects are concerned, the right question to ask of NAFTA is simply whether it indeed succeeded in stimulating trade and investment.

Well, ToutApp has an intriguing value proposition for all those that send a large number of outbound emails that have similar content.

Advancing election technology has proven to be an incredibly vexing proposition for all stakeholders — state and local election officials, voting technology vendors, voter integrity advocates and, of course, the voters themselves.

An indefinite proposition is said to be true if it yields a true proposition (Łukasiewicz says 'judgement' for a definite proposition) for all values of its variables, it is false if it yields a false judgement for all values, and is neither true nor false if it yields true judgements for some values and false judgements for others.

Non-basic propositions depend (directly or indirectly) upon basic propositions for all of their warrant.[23] Suppose that an inquirer, say Fred D'Foundationalist, has given some reasons for his beliefs.

From Proposition 2.5, for all, there exists a for all, (2.25).

Proposition 3.4 For all given symmetric mean m, we have: (1) The sets E − ( A, m ) and E + ( A, m ) are (linearly) convex.

([1], Proposition 2) For all mean M, the mean-map m ↦ R ( A, m, M ) is point-wise affine in the sense that the mean-equality R ( A, ( 1 - t ) m + t m ′, M ) = ( 1 - t ) R ( A, m, M ) + t R ( A, m ′, M ) (2.4).

The following lemma was given in [39], Proposition 2. for all (ngeq1), (a_{n}leq c_{n}) implies (operatorname{LIM}_{n}a_{n} leqoperatorname{LIM}_{n}c_{n}); (operatorname{LIM}_{n}a_{n+N}=operatorname{LIM}_{n}a_{n}) for any fixed positive integer N; (liminf_{ntoinfty}a_{n}leqoperatorname{LIM}_{n}a_{n} leqlimsup_{ntoinfty }a_{n}) for all ({a_{n}}in l^{infty}).