Sentence examples for proposition corresponding to from inspiring English sources

Instead, Russell thought that the proposition corresponding to (1) contains as a constituent the denoting concept all numbers.

The proof is omitted because it is similar to that of the previous proposition corresponding to the upward RRC switch.

If instead, the proposition corresponding to (7) was simply a complex consisting of the relation of identity, Scott, and the author of Waverly himself, since the author of Waverly simply is Scott, the proposition would be the same as the uninformative proposition Scott = Scott.

For each goal-labeled action a abs, if an action goal (which is a conjunctive clause) requires that this property has to be in a particular state l (i.e., a proposition corresponding to l appears in the conjunctive clause expressing the goal of a abs ), for every state in Σ p we add a transition that starts in this state, terminates in l and is labelled with a abs.

The following four propositions corresponding to Propositions 2.1-2.4 arequiredred, and the details are omitted.

After all, the beliefs ascribed to Mary by these sentences are different; so if propositions are the objects of belief, the propositions corresponding to the underlined sentences must be different.

As noted already, descriptions of the agents' priors, their partitions and the game also form part of the description of each possible world, so propositions corresponding to these facts also lie in the meet of the agents' partitions.

Stage theorists can claim that there are a host of distinct propositions corresponding to (10), each with a distinct momentary stage as subject constituent in whatever state the object is in at the time of its existence.

In Hamblin's system, this function maps every possible world to the same set of propositions, corresponding to the set of all possible answers; in Karttunen's system, every world is mapped to a subset of all possible answers, namely those that are true in the given world.

The region C is a part of the region determined by Proposition 1.1 ii), corresponding to the new findings in the paper [21].

The next proposition is corresponding to the case ( 1 + r ) q < p + r of the previous theorem by putting q = p + r ( 1 + r ) α. Proposition 1.4 Let 0 < p, 0 ≤ r.