"proposer to" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that someone is offering a suggestion or potential solution to a problem. For example: "The mayor was the first to proposer to reduce taxes for low-income families."
To study whether a worker's own promise of effort level governs his real choice of effort in a gift exchange game, we implement four treatments in our experiments by varying two factors: (1) who (the firm or the worker) takes the position of the proposer to propose the contract and (2) whether the proposed contract includes a nonbinding specification of the worker's effort level.
We identify a so-called "briber's curse," whereby acceptance of a proposal causes the proposer to downgrade her expected value for the object.
Many have objected to the gesture, saying it was an attempt by Qin Kai (the proposer) to steal his girlfriend He Zi's thunder, or that she was under too much pressure to give an honest answer at that point, and so on.
The question of what sort of action is required of the proposer to violate the recipient's rights, or to make the recipient worse off than she ought to be, is not without difficulty.
The strategy we give here requires the proposer to estimate the character of the responder.
Game theoretic models prescribe that the optimal solution is for the Proposer to offer as little as possible (say 10 cents), and for the Responder to accept this small amount on the grounds that something is better than nothing [ 8].
(In particular, Wertheimer believes that this is frequently best understood as a question of whether the proposer proposes to violate the recipient's rights (Wertheimer 1987, 217).)[13] Yet the mere fact that something threatens one is not sufficient to ground a claim that it coerces anyone; the threat may be wrongful but also trivial.
Probably the most significant change is in the wording in the biosketch section, which now will direct proposers to list five research "products" directly related to the proposal, and up to five additional products, in place of a list of publications.
The heuristic method against which the comparison took place was subjected by its proposers to a systematic evaluation in comparison with alternative heuristics, and shown to perform well [2, 3].
Official, public attention to mentoring began at NSF even before the new law was passed, in a 2 August 2006 "Dear Colleague" letter from Margaret Leinen, assistant director of NSF's Directorate for Geosciences, which alerted potential proposers to "the importance of providing professional development and mentoring" to postdocs.
The objective is to facilitate reaching an agreement at an earlier stage in the negotiation by providing the opportunity to the proposer agent to learn his opponents' preferences.
