The proposal constitutes a threat if the proposer indicates that, if his demand is denied, he will make the recipient worse off than the recipient ought to be.
Both paired subjects receive the proposed amounts if proposer's offer exceeds responder's minimum acceptable offer.
Thus, when a responder rejects an offer from a proposer in the impunity game, she forgoes her own payoff but the proposer still keeps his payoff.
If a proposer does not request any constraints, THE ROLL ANGLES WILL NOT LINE UP, as illustrated in the following figure.
If the proposer requests a constraint, the groups for calculating the constraint values are defined the same as for slew tax calculations.
If a proposer wishes to define such a rectangular region, they should state this request in the "Remarks" field of the RPS form to prompt discussions with a CXC Support Scientist.
The responder in this one-shot anonymous game is endowed with an opportunity to punish the proposer's greed, but, if he did, what he does would cost him all he could own.
However, if a Proposer offers an even split in the Ultimatum Game but an unfair offer in the Dictator Game, we can infer strategic motives.
If they accepted this offer, both they and the proposer would receive the proposed shares of the pot.
