Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(9)
If the proposal is correct, it will set conditions that should help solve the many other problems in reconstructing the origin of life.
If McKenzie and Rapoport ( 2010) proposal is correct, then we should find more evidence of negative selection in states with a tradition of high migration rates.
If our proposal is correct the polypeptide chain elongation rates of rplJ and rplL should be equal.
If our proposal is correct, impaired encoding of intentions should disrupt facilitation for communicative interactions, but not for physically-contingent interactions such as fighting or dancing.
If our proposal is correct, we predict that blocking both processes simultaneously will result in wild type morphology, as the simultaneous interference of both processes will result in a balance.
If this proposal is correct, it would also be relevant for the closest analogue of 44, that is, 41 a.
Similar(51)
Thus, if Moore's proposal were correct, then we ought to be in a position to derive from (i) and/or (ii) the following: (v) "If S can't A, it's not the case that S chooses to A" and (vi) "If S doesn't A, it's not the case that S chooses to A".
If these proposals were correct, we might expect that A+/A− individuals would experience increased morbidity and mortality resulting from P. falciparum infection and therefore reduced fitness.
This is strong evidence that the earlier proposals are correct (flowering plants are tending to lose more sites than they gain).
That is why the Think team's proposal is the correct one for us.
The other half of that proposal is absolutely correct given the above analysis.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com