Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
Sample size has been calculated to estimate a proportions difference in the degree of adherence to the treatment of 20% between the exposed group (drug changes at the pharmacy) and the non-exposed group.
Similar(59)
Prevalence proportion difference, by binomial regression, was used to compare the association between injury prevalence proportion and gender, both among adults and children.
Independent sample t-test of mean and proportion difference has been carried out for observing if there is any significant difference between control and treatment groups.
Phylogenetic orders showed significant variation (P-value< 0.05 and proportion difference > 1%) between biological replicates.
An absolute proportion difference of 1.6%, with 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.4 – 5.6% was observed.
At V1 and V2 the proportion difference was 2 1, but at V3 this difference was more than 4 1.
There is an absolute proportion difference of 1.6%9595% Confidence interval: -2.4 – 5.6%) which lies outside the pre-specified 5% equivalence margin.
Also note that d W uses the absolute proportion difference | p i A − p i B | in its formulation.
This proportion difference was also found to be significant, χ² (1, N = 8266) = 18.1, p < 0.001, with Yates' correction.
The proportion difference for chemoprophylaxis at days 1 to 3 versus after day 3 was not significant (P = 0.7769).
d VAW was developed to moderate the branch proportion difference by its variance and was shown to increase the power of detecting the difference between two microbial communities.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com