Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(14)
For example, in the EW portfolio, the proportion of variation of average abnormal returns explained by the mood variable in the first, second, and third subperiods is 64.1%, 85.8%, and 85.5%, respectively.
The basis for this conjecture is the fact that the proportion of variation of average abnormal returns explained by the mood variable, as measured by the ratio of R2, does not show a declining trend over time.
Although we find a decline in the magnitude of the day-of-the-week effect over time, the proportion of variation of daily average abnormal returns explained by mood remains relatively stable over time.
Since those two averages incorporate mood scores from both 1953 and 2007, they may be more inclusive than the results for the standalone mood score reported in Panels A and B. An important result in Panels C and D is the proportion of variation of average daily abnormal returns explained by mood as measured by the ratio of the R2 of the mood regression to the dummy variable regression.
Using redundancy analysis we found that most environmental variables contributed to explain a large and significant proportion of variation of the intercontinental submodel both for genera and families (54% and 53%, respectively).
All drivers analyzed with the exception of inorganic pollution (INP) explained a large and significant proportion of variation of the intercontinental submodel for both genera and families (54% and 53%, respectively).
Similar(46)
The best model reached a root mean square error (RMSE) of 50.28 which corresponds to a cross-validated proportion of variation explained (q2) of 0.9393 (Table 1).
The predictive performance of the 89-features model to this data was similar to the one obtained with 10-fold cross-validation, with an RMSE of 48.64 and a predictive proportion of variation explained (Q2) of 0.9607.
Fig. 7 The influence of sample size (number of plots) on the proportion of variation in wood volume explained by LiDAR metrics coefficient of determination (a) and root mean square error (b)—at the 1 ha plot scale.
Heritability estimates of the proportion of variation in cytotoxic response due to inherited factors were calculated using variance components analysis using MERLIN 1.1.2 (http://www.sph.umich.edu/csg/abecasis/Merlin/index.html) [38].
The first principal component (PC1) captured 64% of the total variation and a total of 76% cumulative proportion of variation was captured by the first two components (Table S1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com