Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Ultimately, we quantified the proportion of simulation replicates at each time point and for each parameter set where significant negative correlations (at the α = 0.05 level) were detected between landscape coordinates along a South to North axis and inter-individual genetic distances.
The model detects a small proportion of simulation replicates ( <img src="http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/asset?id=info?doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0016858.e048.PNG" class= inline-graphic"/> ) which displays transgenerational differences in all types of genetic effects including additive, dominant, and imprinting.
Legend False positive percentage is defined as the proportion of simulation samples for which at least one pair other than the causal pair (SNP1, SNP2) are significant.
Similar(57)
We estimated the power of the study for a given set of sample size and parameters by simulating data and determining the proportion of simulations for which the null hypothesis is rejected.
The simulated p-value was calculated from the proportion of simulations with a discrepancy greater that that observed in the data.
This method initiates a process of rejection by retaining a small proportion of simulations based on the minimized Euclidean distance calculated between the simulated and observed statistics (with or without PLS).
They are calculated as the proportion of simulations for which the linear combination of effects exceeds the target value.
Also the proportion of simulations showing clustered spatial pattern was always over 50%, even with just five sample plots.
Figure 10c shows the proportion of simulations that identified the power in each cell as exceeding Pthresh.
We then estimated the proportion of simulations where the ratio of proximal costs to physical administration costs (PAc/Pc) is greater than or equal to 1.
The CEAC curve plots the proportion of simulations that will be cost-effective as the WTP threshold is varied along a continuum.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com