Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Figure 2 illustrates the difference of proportion of score between SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF.
Similar(59)
The proportion of scores <11 per patient found in our study is more important than reported in literature [5].
This could imply that with a higher NEDOCS score the subjective feeling is overrated, although these results must be interpreted with caution as such a small proportion of scores was above 100.
That is to say, the effective rate of the TAVT model is 99.51%.The proportion of scoring '1' accounted for 0.49%, which can be considered a small probability event that is almost impossible to happen in one experiment.
The proportion of scores from the permuted data that are better than the best score of the original data is reported as an exact p-value.
% Floor/Ceiling = the proportion of scores at the extremes of the scaling range/SD = Standard deviation.
Values represent proportion of scores that exceeded "passing" for each item.
The proportion of scores was 18% Low Impact, 43% Medium Impact, 28% High Impact, and 11% Very High Impact.
The areas shaded show the proportion of scores that would result in a misclassification using an APACHE II score cut-off of 25 or greater.
The P-value for a given score T was then calculated as the proportion of scores T j that were ≥ T.
Missing scores were pro-rated by adding the product of the proportion of scores missing and the total score on the answered items to the score on the answered items [ 30- 34].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com