Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(7)
The left bar represents the mean proportion of looking time for the virtually novel array in the pre-test phase.
The right bar shows the mean proportion of looking time for the novel array in the test phase.
For the test phase, we compared the proportion of looking time for the novel array to the total looking time for both the novel and familiar arrays.
To represent the proportion of looking time spent fixating the human face stimulus, a similar index was calculated from the time spent looking at the two stimuli using an analogous formula.
As a result, the mean proportion of looking time for the virtually novel array were not significantly different from that expected from chance probability (t(23) = −0.624, p>.1).
Consequently, the proportion of looking at the unhealthy (left) rather than the healthy food (right) in the experimental images was calculated against the proportion of looking toward the left rather than the right side of the screen.
Similar(53)
A direct comparison of mean proportions of looking times between the pre-test and test phases was performed with a two-tailed paired t-test.
Consequently, the mean proportions of looking at the novel array were significantly higher than would be expected from chance probability (t(23) = 2.766, p<.011).
Taken together with the lack of a significant difference in the proportions of looking time for the virtually novel array in the pre-test phase, the significant difference in the proportions of looking time for the novel array in the test phase suggest that the infants had a preference for the novel array.
The left bar represents the mean proportions of looking time for the virtually novel array in the pre-test phase, which were not significantly different from those expected from chance probability (t(23) = −0.913, p>.1).
We conducted an additional analysis using a two-tailed paired t-test to compare the mean proportions of looking time for the virtually novel array in the pre-test phase and the novel array in the test phase.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com