Sentence examples for proportion of improvements from inspiring English sources

To incorporate deteriorations prevented, we calculated the difference in the proportion of improvements minus deteriorations in the intervention group and improvements minus deteriorations in the control group.

When the CR-SMFRS and PR-SMFRS scales were considered in tandem, the findings showed that both ATX-101 doses were associated with a significantly greater proportion of improvements of one point or more in both scales compared with the placebo.

Greatest proportion of improvements were noted in 2009 2010 (87-88% compared to 74-77% in other years), but in multivariate models including age, baseline severity and time period, no statistically significant associations were found with improvement or recovery and time period.

The proportion of improvement of the overall model fit relative to the independence model was good (NFI = 0.912), indicating the proposed model was 91.2 % better than the independence model.

Proportion of improvement in palliation score was evaluated by Fisher's exact test.

Conversely, when reporting results at the specific level, both literatures use a higher proportion of improvement rather than explicit enhancement language.

Figure 6h shows the distribution of dAUC (i.e., the proportion of improvement of AUC by iASeq over the best single-dataset based ranking method in each dataset) in all 40 datasets.

The relationship between the proportion of nucleus boars used and proportion of improvement in genetic gain rate for the terminal and maternal lines are shown in Figures  2 and 3, respectively.

In each dataset, we computed the proportion of improvement in terms of AUC brought by iASeq over the best single-dataset based ranking method (i.e., dAUC = AU C iAseq − AU C bestsingle AU C bestsingle ).

With 34 participants per group, we will have 97% power to find a significant difference between at least two of the 6 groups and 80% power to find a significant difference between Group 6 and Group 2, the treatment groups assumed to differ most in proportion of improvement.

Therefore, with proportions of improvement in HRQoL of 42.5% for the placebo group and 57.5% for the vitamin D group, and using the same error probabilities in a unilateral contrast, a minimum of 137 patients per group (a total of 274 patients enrolled) are estimated as the minimum sample size required by applying the arcsinus approximation.