Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(15)
There was diversity across journals in the proportion of images that included quantitative/ordered categorical information (p<0.001 by exact test) with higher percentage for Radiology than for non-radiology journals (p<0.001).
The proportion of images that provided numbered color scales ranged from 0 80% across journals (exact p<0.001); there were very few such images in Radiology to allow a meaningful statistical comparison against other journals.
The proportion of images with information on contrast use varied from 0 100% across journals (exact p<0.001) and it was higher in Radiology than other journals (p<0.001) (Table 3).
There was diversity across journals in the proportion of images where it was clear that the image was derived from the study population (58 100%, p<0.001 by exact test), with higher percentage for Radiology than for non-radiology journals (p = 0.002).
Table 2 lists the proportion of images, which were able to identify laminar pores.
Aim To audit the proportion of images available for radiological review prior to a Cancer Multidisciplinary Team Meeting (MDTM).
Similar(45)
FM evaluates the proportion of image pixels that matches or misclassifies ground-based K. brevis observations.
Mean proportion of image derived value was 80%% of blood sampling radioactivity.
Table 1 summarized a proportion of image-derived radioactivity to blood sampling radioactivity in each sampling time.
However, for species with unique markings, the water source design produced lower proportions of images suitable for individual identification.
Numbers of each group were converted to percentages to show proportions of images each group appeared in, and data combined into pie charts to demonstrate community composition at each location (Fig. 5).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com