Sentence examples for proportion of fixations from inspiring English sources

A t-test comparing the proportion of fixations on the car between each condition was not statistically significant (t (82) = 1.73, p = 0.087; d = 0.382), and the Bayes factor showed anecdotal evidence for the null, namely the Tyranny of Film hypothesis (BF01 = 1.52).

As with the proportion of fixations, the total time spent on the car was larger for participants in the Comprehension group (16.9 s, SD = 10.8 s) than for the Map task group (11.6 s, SD = 7.1 s) (t (100) = 2.653, p = 0.009; d = 0.53).

A one-way (group, Context + Inference vs. Context + No-inference vs. No-context) between subjects ANOVA found a main effect of viewing group on proportion of fixations on the car during the pre-specified 8-second time window (F (2, 190) = 3.93, p = 0.021, ηp2 = 0.04).

A t-test comparing the proportion of fixations of the car (when on the screen) for each group confirmed that participants in the Comprehension group fixated the car significantly more often (10.2% of fixations) than participants in the Map task group (6.5% of fixations) (t (100) = 3.706, p < 0.001; d = 0.74).

The non-significant trend was for the No-context condition to have a higher proportion of fixations (M = 0.098, SD = 0.045) on the car than the Context group (M = 0.082, SD = 0.036), which is in the opposite direction of what was predicted.

To test this prediction, we created an 8-second time window from when the car first appeared (frame 2758) and right before it was briefly occluded from view again (frame 3028), and we then measured the proportion of fixations of the car for each group.

Thus, with increased age, infants spent an increasingly greater amount of the time fixating on the eyes of own-race faces, whereas the proportion of fixation time on the eyes of other-race faces remained largely unchanged with age (Figure 2).

For the proportion of fixation time on the mouth, we calculated Pearson correlations between the infants' ages in days and the proportion of fixation time on either the other- or own-race mouth, respectively.

For the proportion of fixation time on the nose, we calculated Pearson correlations between the infants' ages in days and the proportion of fixation time on either the other- or own-race nose, respectively.

The age in days was not significantly correlated with the proportion of fixation time on the nose of either the other- or own-race faces, r 37) = −.10, p = .573, and r 37) = .00, p = .999.999

The age in days was significantly and positively correlated with the proportion of fixation time on the own-race eyes (r 37) = .51, p = .001), but not with other-race eyes (r 37) = .19, p = .259).259