However, due to the long time period of the observations and small proportion of discussions being recorded, the effect of the presence of an observer on the findings appeared to be insignificant.
Plahuta (2013) analyzed approximately 1.2 million posts on the discussion forum and produced a customizable chart that permits users to plot, over time, the proportion of discussions containing reference to over 100 different drugs.
Discussions in which a high proportion of the discussion was spent exchanging reasoning or a high proportion was spent exchanging claims were no more likely to produce a high correct revote than were discussions in which a low proportion of time was spent on reasoning or claims.
A large proportion of his discussion is devoted to consideration of natural objections to this positive account.
Improvements in the management of adult sarcoma were observed for soft tissue and bone sarcomas (Table 3): we observed a statistically significant increase in the proportion of EIC discussions (50.0 vs 74.4%, p = 0.020), EIC discussions within 90 days after diagnosis (76.2 vs 100%, p = 0.007) and R0 resections (57.9 vs 91.4%, p = 0.002).
Breast and urological cancer patients had the highest and lowest proportions of research discussion, 35.9 and 15.4 % respectively, and breast cancer patients were significantly more likely to have had discussions about research participation than patients with other tumours, with the exception of colorectal/lower gastrointestinal (GI), haematological and prostate cancer patients.
In a post hoc exploratory analysis, we noted that charts of women under exclusive midwifery care generally had higher proportions of documentation of discussion topics, but also had higher rates of documentation indicating that swabbing for gonorrhea or chlamydia was not done, and that genetic screening was declined or too late to be offered to the woman (data not shown).
A vast proportion of responses and discussion focused on the importance of raising awareness and increasing literacy about mental health in communities.
Other data analysis will include comparing the proportion of participants initiating discussion of influenza vaccine with their health-care provider and the proportion of participants seeking out influenza vaccination, again using chi-square tests.
The secondary study outcomes are the proportion of participants initiating discussion about influenza vaccine with their health care provider, the proportion of participants seeking out influenza vaccine, and the influenza and influenza vaccine knowledge of participants in the control and intervention groups after receiving the intervention.
