Sentence examples for proportion of comparison from inspiring English sources

Seven children excluded from the OM-RCT due to a diagnosis of CSOM at initial assessment[ 16] were not included in this study, although their exclusion may have reduced the proportion of comparison participants at risk of developing CSOM.

We found that while the incidence and proportion of comparison site cancers decreased during the period 1982 2005, the incidence and the proportion of potentially HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancers increased, particularly among recent birth cohorts.

The only other significant change was a slight increase between the pre- and post-intervention periods in the proportion of comparison-unit patients with Medi-Cal insurance (P = 0.03).

Second, what proportion of comparisons has a conserved direction of preference/avoidance between the two species?

Further, despite the increased number of studies, the proportion of comparisons with generic health education has not increased since 2004.

However, the proportion of comparisons yielding a significant p value was much greater, and the associated p values much smaller, than should occur by chance alone.

The proportion of comparisons showing improvements in A- and C-cohorts of the same order of magnitude (minimal-to-small effect sizes, range -0.49 to 0.49) was 80.1% (414 of 517 comparisons).

Conversely, the mismatch distributions of B. carinata, B. carinatocostata and B. turriformis are rather multimodal and ragged, and contain a higher proportion of comparisons resulting in larger genetic distances.

Also provided are summary statistics of genetic distances using a Kimura 2-parameter (K2P) model and include: maximum genetic distance (max), mean interspecific distance (mean) with standard deviation (SD), and the proportion of comparisons of genetic distances greater than 1% (>1%) and greater than 2% (>2%).

Summary statistics of genetic distances using a Kimura 2-parameter (K2P) model include: maximum genetic distance (max), mean interspecific distance (mean) with standard deviation (SD), and the proportion of comparisons of genetic distances greater than 1% (>1%) and greater than 2% (>2%).

Outcome comparisons in effect sizes (Table 6) showed very little variation: the median effect size (0.11 for all comparisons) ranged from 0.05 (asthma) to 0.17 (depression), while the proportion of comparisons with minimal-to-small differences (-0.49 to +0.49; 80% for all comparisons) ranged from 77% (depression and low back pain) to 85% (migraine).