Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
For the sex effect, centers 2 and 3 share the most common DE genes since both have many DE genes and have proportion in common at about 54%.
In this case, we determine that the proportion in common is 50% for n=100.
Moreover, there was significant tissue specificity in ccgs with only a small proportion in common between each tissue.
To generate CAT plots we use the lists of top genes for each of the study including the meta studies and plot proportion in common against the list size.
By calculating the proportion in common for every n, we obtain a concordance at the top (CAT) plot, as shown in Figure 2. The CAT plot in Figure 2, illustrates the differences between concordance for each of the methods considered.
Similar(55)
The combined stress response resulted in 5779 gene changes of which a large proportion were in common with the heat-regulated gene set (60%) and around 13% were shared with the response to drought.
This approach was based on the hypothesis that among the large number of microsatellites distributed across the genome of species of the genus there may be a proportion in genes common to many species with sufficient sequence conservation in flanking regions to allow the design and use of universal SSR primers.
This type of analysis has been referred to as corresponding at the top (CAT) by Irizarray et al. [2] In general, the proportion of genes in common across centers initially increases and then slowly decreases as the list length is increased (Figure 4).
Consistent with previous findings, increasing detection stringency increased the proportion of genes in common between the platforms [ 32].
This consensus map contained a high proportion of markers in common with other published genetic maps and was used as a reference for the overall QTL projections.
A CAT curve is created by plotting the proportion of genes in common between Centers against the number of DE genes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com