Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(53)
Objective: Our purpose was to evaluate the effectiveness of a risk-based intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis strategy for the prevention of early-onset neonatal group B streptococcal disease.
Systematic primary prophylaxis strategy was not evaluated in this study.
In contrast when this proportion is increased, the prophylaxis strategy becomes more cost-effective.
They also illustrate however that systematic primary prophylaxis strategy is more effective than systematic CRAG screening and associated with an acceptable cost-effectiveness ratio (US$511/LYGG).
Because the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of systematic primary prophylaxis strategy vs. CRAG screening ($5111) is less than the Cambodian GDP, this strategy could be considered as a very cost effective strategy to prevent AIDS associated cryptococcosis in Cambodia.
When this latter proportion is about 20.3%, the prophylaxis strategy is a less cost effective strategy (the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of prophylaxis vs. screening is around 1500 $/LYG).
Similar(7)
Prophylaxis strategies include elastic stockings, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), and intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) devices.
To report the incidence of endophthalmitis in association with different antibiotic prophylaxis strategies after intravitreal injections of anti vascular endothelial growth factors and triamcinolone acetonide.
To the best of our knowledge, no study to date has validated such antibacterial prophylaxis strategies in ICU settings, and no data are available to assess ecological risk with regard to bacterial resistance.
This review seeks to summarize work that has been done to build on the current PA-based vaccine methodology and to evaluate the search for future anthrax prophylaxis strategies.
As shown in Figure 3C, the effect of diagnosis coverage on the required number of antiviral courses differed qualitatively between the treatment-only and prophylaxis strategies.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com