Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(6)
If there is no property of truth, or no substantial property of truth, what role does our term 'true' play?
Furthermore, taking up an idea familiar to readers of Moore, the property of truth is a simple unanalyzable property.
In either its speech act or meaning form, the redundancy theory argues there is no property of truth.
The redundancy theory holds that there is no property of truth at all, and appearances of the expression 'true' in our sentences are redundant, having no effect on what we express.
Austin 1950a is ostensibly responding to a proposal in Strawson 1949 according to which the function of the predicate 'is true' is to facilitate the performance of acts of affirmation or agreement, and not to describe things—e.g., statements—as possessing the property of truth.
(See, e.g., Horwich (1990).) Most strictly, so-called transparency or 'see-through' or 'pure disquotational' conceptions of truth (e.g., Field (1994, 2008) and Beall (2005, 2009)) take the defining property of truth to be intersubstitutability of A and Tr ⌜A⌝) in all non-opaque contexts.
Similar(54)
A sentence has this property iff neither of the simple positive properties of truth and falsity can be correctly ascribed to the sentence.
The language L+0 cannot report the capture and release properties of truth itself in conditional form (i.e., T-biconditionals): Tr is transparent on this picture, and so Tr ⌜A⌝) and A are fully intersubstitutable.
The development studies resulted in four candidate ASDAS scores, that fulfilling the clinimetric properties of truth, feasibility and discrimination.
Assume a formula φ(x) is given that is intended to express some property of sentences – truth, for instance.
What is not clear is whether Aristotle relies on (ST) merely as a convenient technical device to capture the more fundamental property of necessary truth-preservation, or whether for him (TP) and (ST) are independent core components of the concept of a syllogism/deduction.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com