Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
Propensity matching at baseline resulted in 2,909 controls well-matched on all baseline characteristics except ELBW status, PDA and presence of neural tube defects (Table 2).
Our results are robust to a variety of model specifications, various measures of influential institutional ownership, different propensity matching methods, and different industry definitions.
Propensity matching identified 89 pairs of patients.
Survival differences during 15 years of follow-up also were assessed with propensity matching.
There was no significant difference in survival in the hyperglycemic group before (P=.87) or after (P=.78) propensity matching.
Fig. 4 Inpatient hospitalization rates during the follow-up period: after propensity matching.
Fig. 2 Mean overall healthcare charges during the follow-up period: after propensity matching.
Fig. 3 Mean diabetes-related healthcare charges during the follow-up period: after propensity matching.
Propensity matching with multivariable logistic regression was used to produce odds ratios (OR) and 95%% confidence intervals.
In comparing these two groups, therefore, they made great efforts to account for these differences, with a statistical technique called propensity matching.
Then, it was the only study in which a Cox model on a propensity matching cohort was used.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com