Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
First results from the only existing prospective, randomized trial to proof the question whether the chemotherapy-radiotherapy or radiotherapy-chemotherapy sequence is better was published 1996 by Recht et al. [ 2].
Similar(59)
A "general proposition" is senseless prior to an inductive proof "because the question would only have made sense if a general method of decision had been known before the particular proof was discovered" (PG 402).
And the same, Plantinga acknowledges, might well be true for exclusivists in other religious belief systems (Plantinga 1997, 296).[3] The strength of this line of reasoning depends in part on the debatable issue of who shoulders the burden of proof on the question of equal epistemic footing.
What are you going to do, ask for proof?" Which raises the question: to what extent are decorators complicit in the deeds of their clients?
If the number of existential instantiations required in the proof is known, the question of whether G follows from F can be decided in a finite number of steps.
Furthermore, to invoke a modalized version of such a consistency proof would beg the question, since it assumes that the use of modal operators is already justified.
Make sure that you arrive at the same answer the question proof asked you to arrive at.
Even if no finitary consistency proof of arithmetic can be given, the question of finding consistency proofs is nevertheless of value: the methods used in such proofs, although they must go beyond Hilbert's original sense of finitism, might provide genuine insight into the constructive content of arithmetic and stronger theories.
For in brief, the "proof" seems question begging (cf. McLaughlin 2000).
The proof in question (which did not use his famous diagonal method) was published as Cantor 1874.
He said that it was unfair to accuse any player without proof, but that the questions about Bonds must be raised.
More suggestions(3)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com