Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
Not in the sense that the state lacked proof — the case against Mr. Simpson remains compelling.
"Designing a standard of proof: the case for professional standards in next-generation sequencing laboratory-developed tests". Journal of Law and the Biosciences 4 (1): 216-226.
The third objection may be thought to present more difficulty than the others, namely, that which alleges that motion arises in things in which it did not exist before, and adduces in proof the case of animate things: thus an animal is first at rest and afterwards walks, not having been set in motion apparently by anything from without.
Proof The case x = 0 is evident.
If n is odd, the reverse inequality of (3) holds for arbitrary 0 < x < 1. Proof The case n = 2 is exactly Theorem 2.3.
If there exists x 0 ∈ X with x 0 ≤ A x 0, then A has a fixed point in X. Proof The case (i), was proved in Theorem 4.2.
Similar(54)
Proof The cases of d ∈ { 2, 3, 4 } can be verified directly.
Proof The proof of the case p = 1 is quite similar to the proof in [21].
Proof We give the proof for the case of (1).
Proof of Theorem 1.1 First we give the proof for the case (i).
"Experience has shown … that we cannot expect the proof of the case to be made through the pleadings, and that such proof is really not their function.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com