Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(31)
In some proofs, however, universal instantiations are required in such large numbers as the proof proceeds that even the most powerful computers cannot produce them fast enough.
The proof proceeds by induction.
Kant's proof proceeds by way of elimination.
The proof proceeds in four steps.
The proof proceeds using arguments of contradiction.
A full proof proceeds in the following steps: 1.
Similar(29)
We start the proof proceeding the lines similar to the proof of Theorem 5 (resp. Theorem 6 or Theorem 7).
uniformly in all compact subsets in Ω. Proof Proceeding as in (2.4), we have lim t → T ∗ sup u ( 0, t ) G ( t ) ≤ a ( 0 ), (2.13).
The latter was proved by the program by asserting that there is no onto function from individuals to sets of individuals, with the proof proceeding by a diagonal argument.
Proof Proceeding along the same lines as in the proof of Theorem 3.2, we know that { g ( x n ) } and { g ( y n ) } are Cauchy sequences in the complete metric space ( X, d ).
Proof Proceeding similarly to the previous theorem, we apply Itô's formula to the process u ( X ( s ), s, α ( s ) ) exp ( ∫ t s c ( X ( r ), r, α ( r ) ) d r ), s ∈ [ t, T ].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com