Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
But there is no proof of misconduct, only speculation.
Some Belleville Catholics were upset that priests were removed from their ministries without clear proof of misconduct.
They made it easier for jurors to find him guilty: there is no clearer proof of misconduct than hearing someone admit to it on tape.
Legal experts, however, have noted that it was possible that federal investigators found proof of misconduct that fell short of a criminal act.
How can a civilised country attack another country without any proof of misconduct?" It was, of course, a reader's letter, but what a breath of fresh air beside the war cries in the rest of Murdoch's press.
How can a civilised country attack another country without any proof of misconduct?" Score one for the PNG resident who refused to be influenced by Blair's silky oratory, Bush's less subtle pressure to invade Iraq or Murdoch's own pro-war propaganda (and thanks to Eoin Blackwell, a former PNG correspondent, for pointing it out).
Similar(53)
That antifraud law does not require proof of intentional misconduct.
Proof of their misconduct, Mr. Mpshe said, had been submitted to prosecutors by Mr. Zuma's legal team, which had come into possession of wiretaps by the National Intelligence Agency.
Under state education law, a trustee appointed by a governor can be removed by the governor only upon proof of official misconduct, neglect of duties or mental or physical incapacity.
It does not require proof of intentional misconduct, and there is even a possibility that a misdemeanor violation could be proved without showing any intent — known as strict liability.
Even as thousands of messages remained elusive, the investigators ultimately reached consensus that the evidence didn't warrant criminal charges, which required proof of intentional misconduct, gross negligence, or efforts to obstruct justice.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com