Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(11)
⇒: Let SCF f be strategy proof, efficient and not a constant function.
The crux of the problem was to design a threshold cryptosystem that would make such a proof efficient.
When we have four or more users, two-stage dictator making mechanisms are strategy proof, efficient, and non-dummy.
The studies by the authors of[18, 27] provided examples of strategy proof, efficient, and non-dictatorial SCFs.
He conjectures that there are no strategy proof, efficient, and non-inversely dictatorial mechanisms in the case of 3 or more users.
When we have four or more users, Kato and Ohseto[18] have shown existence of certain strategy proof, efficient, non-dummy, and dictatorial SCFs.
Similar(49)
Filling in gaps in exposition — shortcuts and abbreviations used to make a proof more efficient — does not count.
"⇐": Let us choose a strategy proof and efficient SCF f.
Let SCF f be strategy proof and efficient.
The mechanism is proved to be strategy proof and efficient.
Let an SCF f be strategy proof and efficient.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com