Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(52)
Proof (1) Since r p k > 1 and ∑ k s 1 p k = r, we get ∑ k s 1 r p k = 1.
BEST VALUE Plymouth English Gin $22 *** 1/282.44 proof 1 liter Subtle and elegant with crisp, lingering flavors of citrus and juniper: a martini in a dinner jacket.
Bombay Sapphire London Dry $30 ** England 94 proof 1 liter Jangly flavors of mint, herbs and citrus, with detectable alcoholic heat: a neurotic martini.(Bombay Spirits, Miami) Quintessential London Dry $30 ** England 80 proof 750 milliliters Smooth and direct, but with an odd, bittersweet flavor: a martini with a blemish.
Proof 1.
Proof (1) is obvious.
Proof (1) and (2) are immediate.
Similar(8)
Proof (1∘) We first prove that { x n } n = 0 ∞ is bounded.
Proof (1 - 2) Proceeding as in the proof of Theorem 4, the parts (1) and (2) hold.
The original Branciari's proof [1] deals with one-dimensional integral, and such conclusion is valid due to the implication (3.1).
Proof 1° It follows from gx0 ≼ fx0 = gx1 that fx0 ≼ fx1, i.e., y0 ≼ y1 and it is easy to proceed by induction.
Diagrams are usually adopted as a heuristic tool in exploring a proof, but not as part of a proof.[1] It is a quite recent movement among philosophers, logicians, cognitive scientists and computer scientists to focus on different types of representation systems, and much research has been focussed on diagrammatic representation systems in particular.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com