projected to merge quickly

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "projected to merge quickly" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing anticipated or forecasted events, particularly in business or technology sectors. Example: "The two companies are projected to merge quickly, creating a stronger market presence."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

France embarks on a geopolitical project to merge Europe with Muslim Mediterranean states.

The Economist

AOL TV is AOLs increasingly less secretive project to merge the Internet with television.

Forbes

This suggests the muscle originating from it was also large, and projected anteroventrally to merge with the soft palate.

F1000Research

America's banks have merged quickly and brutally to slash costs.

The Economist

"You're seeing a lot of projects that try to merge the two together.

Vice

A proposal to merge the teams sank quickly.

The New York Times

Lesson 8: Those who wish to merge should do it quickly.

The New Yorker

However, if the driver has a high FRETc, it drives quickly to merge with the execution phase to undergo apoptosis.

Nature

What projects to pursue hard and which to quickly abandon.

HuffPost

There are no plans to merge Gree's and HotelQuickly's apps, although HotelQuickly CEO Tomas Laboutka recently jointed Gree's board of directors.

Forbes

It quickly attempted to merge with the smaller al-Nusra, but was spurned by both al-Nusra and al Qaeda leadership.

Vice

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "projected to merge quickly" when emphasizing a forecast or expectation of a rapid combination, particularly in business or technology contexts. Ensure the projection is supported by data or analysis for credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "projected to merge quickly" when the merger is merely speculative or based on weak evidence. Overstating the certainty of the event can mislead the audience.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "projected to merge quickly" functions as a predictive statement, indicating a forecast or expectation of a rapid merging process. As Ludwig AI points out, it's grammatically correct but its effectiveness relies heavily on context.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "projected to merge quickly" is grammatically sound and serves to forecast a rapid merging process. As highlighted by Ludwig AI, while technically correct, its frequency of use is currently missing from the provided data. This emphasizes the importance of ensuring adequate support and context when employing the phrase, particularly in more formal settings. Considering alternatives like "expected to integrate rapidly" may provide a more appropriate tone depending on the specific scenario.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

expected to integrate rapidly

Replaces "projected" with "expected", emphasizing anticipation rather than a formal forecast, and "merge" with "integrate", which broadens the scope.

anticipated to combine swiftly

Substitutes "projected" with "anticipated", implying a sense of expectation, and "merge" with "combine", which is a more general term for joining. "Quickly" is changed to "swiftly" for stylistic variation.

forecasted to consolidate rapidly

Replaces "projected" with "forecasted", indicating a prediction based on data, and "merge" with "consolidate", highlighting the strengthening aspect of the union.

predicted to amalgamate quickly

Uses "predicted" instead of "projected", suggesting a less formal prediction, and "amalgamate" instead of "merge", implying a blending of elements.

slated to unify rapidly

Substitutes "projected" with "slated", indicating a planned event, and "merge" with "unify", emphasizing the creation of a single entity.

estimated to fuse swiftly

Replaces "projected" with "estimated", implying an approximation, and "merge" with "fuse", which suggests a strong, inseparable union.

expected to converge quickly

Uses "converge" instead of "merge", implying a coming together from different directions.

anticipated to become one rapidly

Replaces "merge" with a more descriptive phrase "become one", making the sentence less technical.

foreseen to unite swiftly

Uses "foreseen" instead of "projected", implying a prediction based on insight, and "unite" instead of "merge", emphasizing a joining of forces.

destined to integrate swiftly

Substitutes "projected" with "destined", suggesting an inevitable outcome, and "rapidly" with "swiftly" for stylistic variation.

FAQs

How can I use "projected to merge quickly" in a sentence?

You can use "projected to merge quickly" to describe an expected rapid combination of entities. For instance, "The two companies are projected to merge quickly, creating a stronger market presence."

What can I say instead of "projected to merge quickly"?

You can use alternatives like "expected to integrate rapidly", "anticipated to combine swiftly", or "forecasted to consolidate rapidly" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "projected to merge quickly" or "projected to quickly merge"?

"Projected to merge quickly" is the more standard and natural phrasing. While "projected to quickly merge" isn't grammatically incorrect, it's less common and might sound awkward.

What's the difference between "projected to merge quickly" and "expected to merge quickly"?

"Projected to merge quickly" suggests a forecast based on data and analysis, while "expected to merge quickly" implies a general anticipation, which could be based on various factors, not necessarily data-driven.