Sentence examples for prohibiting the introduction from inspiring English sources
Mr. Pennacchio, who holds sacred the West German law prohibiting the introduction of such foreign grains to most beers, shuns such additives, as do most home brewers.
The Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted Thursday to authorize U.S. military action against the Islamic State "and associated forces" for three years, while prohibiting the introduction of ground combat troops.
One of the first acts of the committee was to send to England a petition protesting against the infringement by the Dutch of the treaty of 1824 by prohibiting the introduction of British manufactured goods into Java.
By the spectacular vote of 416-5, tHouseuse adopted an amendment initiated by Michigan Representative John Conyers prohibiting the introduction into Libya of U.S. ground troops (that is, uninformed forces, not Special Forces or CIA that are already there).
We will attempt to minimise 'learning curve' issues for the surgical interventions by allowing the surgeon to use techniques with which they are familiar, but prohibiting the introduction of radically new or experimental methods during the recruitment period.
This current legislation is weak, because measures for the protection of vegetation, prohibiting the introduction of plants and animals, preventing fire, removal of soil, and dumping of refuse, and the control of vehicles are lacking.
But Massiah does not prohibit the introduction of spontaneous statements that are not elicited by governmental action.
See ante, at 270. "Massiah does not prohibit the introduction of spontaneous statements that are not elicited by governmental action.
The statute prohibits the "introduction or delivery" of the drugs, but Google was not involved in any way in their actual transfer into the United States, which is the usual means of proving a violation of the statute.
The Endangered Species Act, he said, prohibits the introduction of an experimental species in places where there is a naturally occurring species of the same kind; so the new wolves must go.
This case presents the question whether the exclusionary rule, which generally prohibits the introduction at criminal trial of evidence obtained in violation of a defendants Fourth Amendment rights, applies in parole revocation hearings.
