Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
In our study we wanted to investigate whether the local effect of ingested pesticides (orally administered) on the intestinal track could induce alpha-synuclein accumulation in the ENS and thereby induce PD-like pathological progression predicted by Braak's model.
Using these diagnostic criteria, we found an incidence of severe sepsis of 12.4%, which is comparable to that of other series published in recent years and in line with the progression predicted by Martin et al. [ 1].
Similar(58)
Our longitudinal modelling shows that disease burden and progression is predicted by muscle mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy level, mitochondrial DNA deletion size and the location of the mitochondrial DNA deletion within the mitochondrial genome.
In order to test whether the local effect on the ENS of an orally administered pesticide could reproduce the progression of PD predicted by Braak's model, we decided to administer rotenone intragastrically to one-year old mice using a gastric tube.
Fast disease progression was further predicted by concomitant meniscal damage, mainly in the form of tears and meniscal extrusions [ 14].
Radiographic progression was also predicted by a positive IgM-RF (p0.0009), and a high baseline joint damage (p = 0.0044).
This progression was best predicted by IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 (area under the curve ≥ 0.8).
Multiple regression analysis revealed that point of screw insertion (one for lateral and two for medial) was an independent prognostic factors for slip progression, and could be predicted by the following formula: (progression of PTA) = (progression of PTA) = -1.523 + 2.701 × (point of screw insertion), R = 0.148, p = 0.005.
The onset and progression of damage are predicted by two stress-based failure criteria.
Differences in progression rates are best predicted by pre-existing damage (for example, TSS at baseline).
Furthermore, disease progression was not reliably predicted by an increase in ECD levels.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com