The phrase "profound review" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It typically refers to a thorough and in-depth examination or assessment of something, such as a book, research paper, or project. You can use it when discussing a detailed analysis or critique of something. Here is an example sentence: "The professor assigned a profound review of the assigned reading, requiring students to analyze the author's argument and provide their own insights."
Speech and voice technologies are experiencing a profound review as new paradigms are sought to overcome some specific problems which cannot be completely solved by classical approaches.
Therefore, we have carried out a comprehensive and profound review of documents from policy consulting institutions, such as the German Advisory Council on Global Change, science, NGOs, unions and other stakeholders and the media as well as the target agreements of other comparable countries to identify and adopt appropriate proposals for binding or non-binding targets.
"Only last week a charity helped to win a judicial review with profound consequences for prisoners' rehabilitation, by overturning the book ban in prisons," said Nandy, "These are the sorts of poor decisions judicial review ought to challenge".
Ed Miliband has called the Prime Minister's announcement of the Defence Spending Review a "profound missed opportunity".
That said, inattention to content expertise in nutrition is a profound deficiency in this review.
In 2013, we had read with great interest a review titled "Profound Methyl Effects in Drug Discovery and a Call for New C H Methylation Reactions".
Clinically, more attractive methods include non-invasive imaging of hypoxia-selective fluorinated nitroimidazoles developed for positron emission tomography (PET) and blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) MRI, but these techniques are expensive and have profound weaknesses (for a review on imaging techniques see [ 7]).
Frequently, research projects that are of profound national interest are reviewed by National Ethics Review Committees rather than Institutional Ethics Review Committees.
In summary, this review shows the profound impact that HIV/AIDS-treatment costs have in the countries studied.
Amicus briefs recently filed with the Supreme Court supporting former Alabama Governor Don Siegelman's request for Supreme Court review confirm these profound implications.
Findings The review discovered a profound malaise about the way UNICEF handles its human resources.
