Sentence examples for profiles categorised from inspiring English sources

Values above the 95th percentile of profiles categorised as satisfactory were defined as 'low' improvement potential.

The highest number of parameters with improvement potential was found in CGM profiles categorised as poor.

Improvement potential increases for CGM profiles categorised from very good to poor.

In total, 90% of profiles categorised as fair or poor had at least three parameters that could potentially be optimised.

Overall, more than 80% of profiles categorised as fair or poor had at least three factors to optimise (Additional file 1: Figure S4).

First, we defined the limits of the improvement potential using the 95th percentile of each Q-Score parameter of profiles categorised by the diabetes specialists as very good and good.

Profiles were categorised into one of two groups.

Expression profiles were categorised into four quartiles, with the highest quartile representing the genes that had the top 25% expression levels prior to DAC treatment.

The UGT1A1 genetic profiles were categorised into three groups as described previously (Sato et al, 2011): wild-type (*1/*1), heterozygous (*1/*6, *1/*28), and homozygous (*6/*6, *6/*28, *28/*28).

The 79 eligibility criteria that referenced medication-related information that could possibly be included in a broad Medication Profile were categorised as described in Figure 4.

Molecular profiling has categorised five types of breast cancer, each of which contain many heterogeneous cells that cross-talk with each other and with their microenvironment through various signalling pathways (Korkaya et al, 2011; Perou et al, 2011).