Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "productivity on" is not a complete sentence and is not grammatically correct.
It is possible to use "productivity" with "on" in a sentence, but it would need to be in a different sentence structure. One possible way to use "productivity on" is in a comparative sentence, such as: "Productivity on the new system has increased by 20% compared to the old system." In this case, "on" is used to indicate the specific aspect or area that productivity has improved on (in this case, the new system). Another way to use "productivity on" could be in a sentence discussing a specific aspect or factor that affects productivity, such as: "The team's productivity is heavily dependent on the efficiency and accuracy of their communication." In this example, "productivity on" is used to specify the factor (communication efficiency and accuracy) that impacts productivity. Overall, "productivity on" is a specific phrase that can be used to indicate a certain aspect or factor related to productivity, but it cannot stand alone as a complete sentence.
Exact(57)
Productivity on steroids becomes mass production.
But as Yossi Verter, a leading political commentator for Haaretz, wrote: On one hand, that is impressive productivity; on the other, it is scary.
Diatoms are important planktons that are believed to be responsible for one-fifth of the primary productivity on Earth [ 1, 2].
Aluminium (Al) toxicity is considered to be one of the major constraints affecting crop productivity on acid soils.
It'll be productivity on the factory floor and quality in the finished product.
The effect of higher productivity on the probability of receiving a positive payoff is positive, as one would expect.
Farm productivity, on average, went up.
(The PER system rates productivity on a per-minute basis. The league average is 15).
In all, our single species now commandeers somewhere between 25%and40%0% of primary productivity on Earth.
Similar(2)
viliv N5 : Productivity on-the-go – Revolutionized.
This sounds like the kind of productivity-on-the-cheap deal any business would want.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com