Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(2)
The most serious version of this objection, advanced by Stephen Schiffer (1993, 2006), John Hawthorne (1990 , 1993, and many other philosophers, focuses on the productivity of language.
One is that it suggests an obvious route for scaling up the productivity of language processing systems: nominalizations sometimes outnumber verbal forms significantly, and handling them can yield a substantial increase in recall.
Similar(58)
Bauer (1983): 42) explains that: When a word first appears in a language, whether as a loan or calque, or as a nonce formation, it appears that speakers are aware of its newness, that is they are aware that they are exploiting the productivity of the language system.
These features include an awareness of its newness, recognition that the productivity of the language system is being exploited, the use of 'so-called' and scare quotes, and explanations and definitions of the term in apposition or in a non-restrictive relative clause (cf. Goatly (1997, 171 175) typology of "definitional contexts").
The fact that systematicity and productivity depend on the compositional structure of language means that language has a combinatorial semantics.
Since the defining characteristic of language is its productivity, one of the most important aspects of this acquisition process is the formation of generalizations that allow speakers to produce novel utterances, while avoiding those that fellow speakers would consider unacceptable.
Fodor notes that productivity and systematicity are features not just of thought but also of language, and concludes that representational structure must be linguistic.
This model exploits indexation techniques and natural language processing to increase productivity of knowledge engineering task during the integration of conceptual model.
Sharing outside of language.
use of language consultants. .
So different choice of language.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com