Sentence examples for productivity grants from inspiring English sources

However, only 4 researchers out of the remaining 17 (23 %) have productivity grants from CNPq (all level 2).

It is a tribute to Lumina, but also to the 11 states who have managed its productivity grants, the seven new states who have joined these 11 and are networked as Productivity Strategy Labs, and to the state advisers and other key persons involved in this work.

It is also interesting to notice that all topmost researchers receive productivity grant from CNPq (one level 1D and all other level 2, by 2013).

Going in a different direction, we computed the correlation (Spearman) between the percentages of papers with the previous supervisor and holding or not productivity grant from CNPq.

Safe Science also mentions faculty independence and intense pressure for productivity as important sources of "potential conflict between a culture of safety and productive grant-supported research".

Among postdocs, postdoctoral fellows those with actual fellowships added more productivity than grant-supported postdocs did (0.29 versus 0.19).

(2) Be explicit about the criteria used in evaluating the scientific productivity of grant applicants and clearly highlight, especially for early-stage investigators, that the scientific content of a paper is much more important than publication metrics or the identity of the journal in which it was published.

Be explicit about the criteria used in evaluating the scientific productivity of grant applicants and clearly highlight, especially for early-stage investigators, that the scientific content of a paper is much more important than publication metrics or the identity of the journal in which it was published.

FRK was sponsored by a PhD grant (140578/2009-9), MA by a PDJ (509828/2010-8) and RM by a Productivity and Research grant (303967/2008-0) from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, Brazil).

Questions regarding the research by this group first arose in 2007, and it is likely that the subsequent investigations had a negative effect on the productivity of the grant.

Dr. Dan Rotrosen, Director of the Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, recently noted how Dr. Eisenbarth's productivity from that grant was exceptional and clearly disproportionate to the modest funding it received.