Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Facies analysis indicate that sand gross thickness varies from 190 to 280 ft., 201 239 ft. and 71 109 ft., for horizons H10, G20 and E40 respectively (Table 1), while the hydrocarbon saturated sand thicknesses, representing productive thickness of reservoir sands H10, G20 and E40 ranges from 180 to 265 ft, 189 230 ft. and 65 98 ft., respectively (Table 1).
Similar(58)
Experiments attempting to realistically simulate grazing may benefit from these findings, particularly in very productive grasslands where the thickness of the organic layer increases rapidly under grazing exclusion.
Such heterogeneities are below seismic resolution but we show that some seismic attributes are useful to obtain a better estimate of the nonreservoir cumulative thickness in the productive stratigraphic unit.
If the water wells in the study area are generally screened in the most productive intervals of the aquifers only, then aquifer thickness can be defined as the total length of screened interval (e.g., Mace et al. 2000).
In this regard, we argue that decreasing the thickness below around 40 μm is counter-productive, as it significantly reduces the maximum achievable efficiency, even when an optimal light trapping is implemented.
However, the backfat thickness of the ewes significantly affected all the reproductive and productive traits, except for ewes conceived/ewes joined, and lambs born/ewe lambing.
Three Egyptian sheep breeds (Rahmani, n = 40; Barki, n = 50; Ossimi, n = 36) were used to investigate the effect of backfat thickness of ewes, at mating, on their subsequent reproductive and productive performances.
An assembly of 18 tubular membranes of V-5.2at%Pd with 145 µm wall thickness was designed for feeding 1 kW PEMFC and demonstrated a highly productive extraction of ultrapure hydrogen from WGS mixture.
However, no significant differences were recorded for ewes with a backfat thickness of 1.5 to <2 mm, and those having ≥2 mm regarding all the reproductive and productive traits, except for ovulation rate.
More productive.
Very productive.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com