Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(13)
An IVC/Ao cutoff of 0.63 produced a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 100% for DRFR.
An IVC/aorta cutoff of 0.8 produced a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 56% for the diagnosis of significant dehydration [89].
The ACI-TIPI equation would have produced a sensitivity of 99.5% and a specificity of 3.9%.
also produced a sensitivity of 100.0% but with a slightly lower specificity of 92.3%.
For cost studies, this term produced a sensitivity of 96.2% and a specificity of 98.0% while for economics studies, it produced a sensitivity of 96.8% and a specificity of 97.5%.
Thus, if ST segment elevation patients were included in the validation set (N = 7,772), attribute matching would have produced a sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 24.6%.
Similar(47)
The LEAF-Q was validated in endurance athletes (Cronbach's α ≥ 0.71) with scores ≥8 producing a sensitivity of 78%% and specificity of 90%% to correctly classify energy availability and/or reproductive function and/or bone health [12].
This is based on two smear samples being used in the initial SSM test, producing a sensitivity of 0.55.
Of the two groups of diabetes patients, 74.1% (177 of 239) and 45.6% (98 of 215) were identified as patients using an HbA1c cut-point of 48 mmol/mol (6.5%) recommended by ADA, producing a sensitivity of 60.6% and a specificity of 96.2%.
As observed with our DNA barcode using the RDP-II database, assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of the Bacteroidetes DNA barcode reported by Dick and Field produced a sensitivity score of 88.00% (compared to 96.52% for our Bacteroidetes barcode) and a specificity score of a 99.25% (compared to 99.98% for our Bacteroidetes barcode).
Wohlfarth et al. showed that a cut-off score of 35 on the total IES-score produced a sensitivity of.89, and a specificity of.94 against the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for PTSD as the gold standard [ 26].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com