Sentence examples for processing of numbers from inspiring English sources

A less distinct numerical advantage was expected for asemantic processing of numbers vs. words, since words compared to numbers could be processed semantically as well.

In other words, the numerical advantage was assumed to be the most distinct pattern for asemantic processing of numbers vs. letters, since numbers in contrast to letters could be processed semantically, even though not obligatorily.

For example, cognitive scientists who study the brain's processing of numbers posit a "mental number line" that people all use when dealing with numbers – it's just that only synaesthetes are aware of having spatial associations with numbers.

These results suggest that forward recitation of numbers and the alphabet is typically based on verbal processing of numbers implemented in the perisylvian area, whereas backward recitation would likely require additional neural resources in the IPS.

For math, adultlike neural patterns in the intraparietal sulcus, a region of the brain involved with the processing of numbers, were linked to higher scores.

Correspondingly, we will summarize neuropsychological findings according to three aspects: (i) asemantic processing of numbers vs. letters, (ii) asemantic processing of numbers vs. words, (iii) semantic processing of numbers vs. words.

The assumption was made that processing of number semantics, executive processes associated with 2-way decision making and error monitoring, had little effect on activity with amodal processes, linguistic or memory related, associated with narrative production.

In contrast, in a pair of experiments we found serial minimum-time processing of number and size, an outcome which excludes the possibility of interaction.

First, on a theoretical level, it is assumed that in the context of number processing IPS activation reflects the processing of number magnitude information [ 28, 9].

Instead, these findings corroborate the assumption of automated processing of number magnitude information even when presented auditorily.

Thus, this hemispheric asymmetry provided evidence for a relative lateralization in the processing of number magnitude and parity information.