Sentence examples for processing for review from inspiring English sources

Calcium channels have also been implicated in pain processing (for review, see Yaksh [ 97]).

The left PTr has often been reported as activated during lexico-semantic processing (for review see Jobard, Crivello, & Tzourio-Mazoyer, 2003).

Consistent with its putative role in cognition, the cerebellum forms close connections with neocortical brain regions including the prefrontal cortex, thus providing the neural basis through which the cerebellum contributes to neocortical information processing (for review see [ 16]).

The posterior middle temporal gyrus between y = −40 and y = −69 was selected as a ROI given its association with tool processing (for review see Beauchamp and Martin 2007).

Although the left fusiform gyrus is typically activated in visual word tasks, this specialization does not necessarily exclude the participation of this region in other forms of processing, such as picture recognition, nor does it exclude the participation of additional regions in visual word processing (for review see [ 7, 43]).

Even more relevant for the current discussion, is that some regions like frontal lobes are usually not activated at all during unconscious processing (for review see Dehaene and Changeux 2011)—evidence that is taken to support theoretical models, such as Global Workspace Theory (Dehaene et al. 1998).

Surprisingly, despite extensive research on both mental rotation (for reviews see: Peters & Battista, 2008; Zacks, 2008) and basic number processing (for reviews see: Cohen Kadosh et al., 2008; Cohen Kadosh & Walsh, 2009), there is a lack of previous research satisfactorily explaining how these two cognitive faculties may relate to one another.

Other studies using appropriate fixation and stimulus control and a variety of paradigms and procedures have also found no evidence of split-fovea processing (for reviews, see [4], [5] and Footnote 1 in File S1).

The fronto-central positive potential (emerging around 200 ms and) peaking around 280 ms after incorrect keypresses strongly resembles the Error Positivity (Pe), a potential frequently observed following the ERN in studies of error processing (for reviews, see [45], [46]).

The efference copy is, however, not used to generate the ongoing motor activity, but can be used to predict the outcome of the motor command [24] [28] (information of efference copies interact at several levels of the central nervous system, and often modulate sensory processing; for reviews, see [34], [35]).

EEG-studies on error processing (for reviews, see [12] [14]) isolated a component of the event-related potential (ERP) appearing shortly after participants commit an error in a variety of speeded response tasks (termed the error-related negativity, ERN or Ne [15], [16]).