process with experts

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "process with experts" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a procedure or method that involves collaboration or consultation with knowledgeable individuals in a specific field. Example: "To ensure the best outcomes, we will process with experts in environmental science to assess the impact of our project."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

8 human-written examples

While her research was promising, he said, she ran into problems with the peer review process, with experts demanding more data.

The New York Times

The study was performed through a two-round Delphi iterative consultation process with experts (Keeney, Hasson, & McKenna, 2006).

International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education

The interactive multimedia system was the result of a participatory design process with experts and potential users in collaboration with Saab Automobile.

International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics

We report a two round Delphi process with experts in the area of glaucoma screening.

BMC Health Services Research

Face and content validity of the questionnaire was obtained through a review process with experts in the field.

BMC Medical Education

In Phase 2, the proposed outcomes were submitted to scrutiny by a two-iteration Delphi process with experts in the field.

BMC Medical Education

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

Vignettes were developed using the published literature and an iterative consultation process with expert clinicians and patient representative groups.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Our approach in this regard coincides with that of Rong and Ling (2008), who state that the proposals for ICT competence and literacy models and elements based on standards and derived from consultation processes with experts or Delphi techniques provide the dimensions and competences that need to be included therein.

International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education

We also added the route of exposure to our analysis of PCB and PBDE studies because it is, according to our personal experience, the subject of intense debate (in peer review processes) with experts often displaying widely varying opinions.

Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source

I trust the government, which has cross-party, cross-sector support for this – as, by the way, we have demonstrated in our extensive and transparent consultation process with both experts and the wider public – to take on with enthusiasm this vital challenge of defining and delivering a visible, truly world-leading strategy for public sector information.

The Guardian

Domains and good practice statements were revised through a week-long consultation process with international experts.

BMJ Open

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a procedure, be specific about the type of experts involved and their role in the "process with experts" to provide clarity and context.

Common error

Avoid vague language when using the phrase "process with experts". Specify the area of expertise and how it contributes to the process. For example, instead of stating "we used a process with experts", specify "we used a process with environmental science experts to assess the impact of the project".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "process with experts" typically functions as a noun phrase, often used as a subject or object in a sentence. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct and can be used to describe procedures that involve knowledgeable individuals. Examples in Ludwig show usage across scientific and business contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

66%

News & Media

19%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "process with experts" is a grammatically correct and usable expression that describes a procedure involving consultation or collaboration with knowledgeable individuals. According to Ludwig AI, its usage is most prevalent in scientific, news and formal business contexts, indicating its suitability for formal communication. When using the phrase, it is crucial to specify the expertise to avoid vagueness and to enhance clarity. Alternatives such as "consult with specialists" or "collaborate with professionals" may be considered based on the specific context. Overall, the phrase effectively conveys the importance of expert involvement in achieving desired outcomes.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

consult with specialists

Focuses on the act of seeking advice and guidance from experts.

collaborate with professionals

Emphasizes a joint effort and teamwork with skilled individuals.

engage expert assistance

Highlights the act of securing help from experts.

seek expert input

Focuses on obtaining opinions and feedback from specialists.

utilize expert knowledge

Emphasizes the use of experts' understanding in the process.

involve specialists

Highlights the inclusion of specialists in the process.

incorporate expert advice

Focuses on integrating advice from experts into the process.

employ expert consultants

Specifies the engagement of consultants with specialized knowledge.

access expert insights

Emphasizes the ability to gain valuable insights from specialists.

draw on expert skills

Focuses on using the abilities and expertise of specialists.

FAQs

How can I use "process with experts" in a sentence?

You can use "process with experts" to describe a procedure that involves consultation or collaboration with knowledgeable individuals in a specific field. For example, "The development of the new policy involved a thorough "consultation with experts" in public health".

What are some alternatives to "process with experts"?

Alternatives include "consult with specialists", "collaborate with professionals", or "engage expert assistance", depending on the context.

Is it better to say "process with experts" or "expert-led process"?

Both phrases are correct, but they emphasize different aspects. "Process with experts" highlights the involvement of experts in the process, while "expert-led process" emphasizes that the process is directed or guided by experts.

What's the difference between "process with experts" and "expert review"?

"Process with experts" describes a comprehensive procedure that incorporates expert knowledge and collaboration. "Expert review", on the other hand, specifically refers to the evaluation or assessment of something by experts.