The phrase "process of justification" is correct and can be used in written English.
It refers to the steps or actions taken to prove or demonstrate the validity or justification of something. Example: The lawyer outlined the process of justification for her client's innocence, presenting evidence and calling witnesses to support his case.
A process of justification and rationalization and remembering ensues.
Such a role may involve a process of justification that requires the obfuscation of reality.
Through a process of justification the seriousness of the crisis is denied.
It may be that in the process of justification, reasons will emerge for privileging those who were particularly involved in the production of a good.
But many advocates of methodologies of discovery regard the context of pursuit as an integral part of the process of justification.
An obvious problem with this picture is that the community-wide process of justification must still be carried out in some fashion by individual actors.
From the standpoint of argumentation theory, (U) seems to state the burden of proof that structures an adequate process and procedure of justification.
We may demand a better account of the apparent positivity of evil – of the fact, for example, that holocausts and massacres often involve meticulous planning, technical innovation and creative processes of justification.
Some feminists argue that, given that values do play a role in scientific inquiry, socially progressive values ought to shape not only decisions about what to investigate but also the processes of justification.
Once again we can illustrate such a position by considering a reliable process theory of justification.
No defender of a reliable process theory of justification is apt to regard reliability as determined merely by the actual frequency of true versus false belief production or sustenance.
