This information-gathering process involved reviewing documentation (e.g., guidelines, websites) from the 13 translation companies and conducting follow-up discussions via telephone or email to clarify the exact LV methods used by each company.
This process involved reviewing, comparing, labeling, and categorizing the data, and then drawing connections between categories according to a coding strategy that involved conditions, context, interactions and consequences.
This process involved reviewing, comparing, labeling, and categorizing the data, and putting these findings together by making connections between categories according to a coding strategy that involved conditions, context, interactions, and consequences.
The systematic process involved reviewing the current literature, specifying a multi-dimensional conceptual framework, evaluating prior instruments, developing items, and conducting focus groups with instructors and patients of body awareness-enhancing therapies.
Content analysis was an iterative process, involving review and discussion between the researchers.
A logic model (Fig. 2) was developed through an iterative process involving review of Avahan documentation, relevant literature, and interactions with government and Avahan staff involved in the design and implementation of the transition.
Development of the item pool was based on an iterative process involving review of the historical and contemporary literature in the refugee field in general, and in relation to West Papua in particular.
The process has involved reviewing a large number of nominations.
